Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Rev. esp. enferm. dig ; 114(12): 752-752, diciembre 2022. ilus
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-213538

RESUMO

La amiloidosis es una enfermedad por depósito extracelular de proteínas anormalmente plegadas, cuya afectación gastrointestinal es relativamente frecuente en su forma sistémica, siendo rara la enfermedad gastrointestinal aislada. Presentamos el caso de un varón de 62 años evaluado por anemia ferropénica y epigastralgia tras iniciar tratamiento antiagregante con ácido-acetilsalicílico y ticagrelor por cardiopatía isquémica. Se realizó dentro del estudio una esofagogastroduodenoscopia donde se evidenciaron pliegues engrosados con morfología pseudopolipoidea e imagen de mucosa nodular con patrón de criptas conservado en bulbo y segunda porción duodenales. (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Amiloidose , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal , Biópsia
2.
Rev. esp. enferm. dig ; 114(3): 146-150, marzo 2022. tab
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-205573

RESUMO

Antecedentes y objetivo: la ecoendoscopia con punción-aspiración con aguja fina (USE-PAAF) es el método de elección para la toma de muestras de lesiones sólidas pancreáticas. Sin embargo, existe una heterogeneidad significativa en cuanto a la técnica utilizada. La aspiración intermitente no ha sido evaluada en lesiones sólidas pancreáticas y podría mejorar el rendimiento diagnóstico.Métodos: estudio piloto de no inferioridad, simple ciego. Se incluyeron de forma prospectiva pacientes con lesiones sólidas pancreáticas e indicación de USE-PAAF. Los pacientes fueron asignados aleatoriamente para el método de aspiración intermitente (AI) o continua (AC). Se evaluaron el rendimiento diagnóstico, la celularidad, la contaminación hemática y el número de pases necesarios para llegar al diagnóstico.Resultados: treinta y tres pacientes fueron asignados a AC (16 pacientes) o AI (17 pacientes). El rendimiento diagnóstico fue del 87,5 % en AC y del 94,1 % en AI (OR 2,29, IC 95 %: 0,19-27,99, p = 0,51). En el grupo de AI las muestras tuvieron mayor celularidad (OR 1,83, IC 95 %: 0,48-6,91, p = 0,37) y menor contaminación hemática (OR 0,38, IC 95 %: 0,09-1,54, p = 0,18). El número de pases necesarios para llegar al diagnóstico fue de 2,12 en AC y 1,94 con AI (p = 0,64). Se obtuvo citología líquida en el 73,3 % de AI y en el 61,5 % de AC (OR 1,72, IC 95 % 0,35-8,50).Conclusiones: la técnica de AI no fue inferior a la AC en términos de precisión diagnóstica, con tendencia a obtener mayor celularidad, menor contaminación hemática y frecuente presencia de bloque celular en la evaluación de lesiones sólidas pancreáticas. (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Aspiração por Agulha Fina Guiada por Ultrassom Endoscópico/métodos , Pâncreas/diagnóstico por imagem , Pâncreas/patologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Diagnóstico
3.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 114(3): 146-150, 2022 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33947194

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: endoscopic ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is the method of choice for sampling pancreatic solid lesions. However, there is significant heterogeneity in terms of the technique used. Intermittent aspiration has not been evaluated in pancreatic solid lesions and could improve the diagnostic performance. METHODS: a single-blind, non-inferiority pilot study was performed. Patients with solid pancreatic lesions and an indication for EUS-FNA were prospectively included. Patients were randomly assigned to intermittent (IS) or continuous (CS) suction techniques. Diagnostic performance, cellularity, blood contamination and the number of passes required to reach a diagnosis were evaluated. MAIN RESULTS: thirty-three patients were assigned to CS (16 patients) or IS (17 patients). Diagnostic performance was 87.5 % for CS and 94.1 % for IS (OR 2.29, 95 % CI: 0.19-27.99, p = 0.51). In the IS group, samples had a higher cellularity (OR 1.83, 95 % CI: 0.48-6.91, p = 0.37) and lower blood contamination (OR 0.38, 95 % CI: 0.09-1.54, p = 0.18). The number of passes required to reach a diagnosis was 2.12 for CS and 1.94 for IS (p = 0.64). Liquid cytology was obtained in 73.3 % of IS and 61.5 % of CS (OR 1.72, 95 % CI: 0.35-8.50). CONCLUSIONS: the IS technique was not inferior to CS in terms of diagnostic accuracy in the evaluation of pancreatic solid lesions, with a tendency to obtain higher cellularity, lower blood contamination and the frequent presence of cell block.


Assuntos
Aspiração por Agulha Fina Guiada por Ultrassom Endoscópico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Aspiração por Agulha Fina Guiada por Ultrassom Endoscópico/métodos , Humanos , Pâncreas/diagnóstico por imagem , Pâncreas/patologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Projetos Piloto , Método Simples-Cego
4.
Nutrients ; 13(1)2020 Dec 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33396719

RESUMO

A lifelong gluten-free diet (GFD) is the only current treatment for celiac disease (CD), but strict compliance is complicated. Duodenal biopsies are the "gold standard" method for diagnosing CD, but they are not generally recommended for disease monitoring. We evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of fecal gluten immunogenic peptides (GIPs) to detect duodenal lesions in CD patients on a GFD and compared them with serum anti-tissue transglutaminase (tTG) IgA antibodies. A prospective study was conducted at two tertiary centers in Spain on a consecutive series of adolescents and adults with CD who maintained a long-lasting GFD. Adherence to a GFD and health-related quality of life were scored with validated questionnaires. Mucosal damage graded according to the Marsh-Oberhüber classification (Marsh 1/2/3) was used as the reference standard. Of the 97 patients included, 27 presented duodenal mucosal damage and 70 had normal biopsies (Marsh 0). The sensitivity (33%) and specificity (81%) of GIPs were similar to those provided by the two assays used to measure anti-tTG antibodies. Scores in questionnaires showed no association with GIP, but an association between GIPs and patients' self-reported gluten consumption was found (p = 0.003). GIP displayed low sensitivity but acceptable specificity for the detection of mucosal damage in CD.


Assuntos
Anticorpos/sangue , Doença Celíaca/sangue , Duodeno/metabolismo , Fezes , Glutens/metabolismo , Mucosa Intestinal/metabolismo , Peptídeos/metabolismo , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Monitorização Fisiológica , Estudos Prospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...